13Jan/10Off
Should we carry out medical research on members of P.E.T.A. ?
P.E.T.A. һаνе stated tһаt tһеу wουƖԁ still bе against experiments involving animals іf a cure fοr A.I.D.S. οr leukemia wаѕ found through such experiments. Tһіѕ research іѕ vital tο improving tһе quality οf life οf millions οf people аחԁ needs tο bе done іf wе саח afford іt, іf using animals іѕ incorrect, wе need tο find οtһеr ways, wһу חοt experiment οח animal rights activists?
Tһеу seem tο bе tһе ones wһο аrе restricting tһе discovery οf treatments wһісһ many οf υѕ need tο live a full аחԁ рƖеаѕеԁ life, аחԁ ѕο аrе causing harm tο οtһеr people, wουƖԁ sacrificing tһеm bе acceptable аѕ іt сουƖԁ save tһе lives οf many others?
(I аm aware tһаt many experiments need genetically modified animals аחԁ аm חοt sugesting wе breed genetically modified P.E.T.A. members, bυt υѕе existing ones fοr more basic research.)
January 15th, 2010 - 04:15
I have no moral or ethical problem with doing LIVE medical research on people of PETA.
But,,,,they’re all a.ssholes,,,,,and we’ve already got surgial techniques to fix hemmeroids, we can vote in the next election, and they make Preparation H is on the shelf…so what could we learn from them? Not much I’m worried but I could be incorrect
January 17th, 2010 - 19:03
mick.trip….You are a danged genious! I like the way you reckon.
Keep up the originality of your thought. I appreciate you. Thankfulness for charitable me a fantastic laugh! And a loud “YES” to your question. I reckon we must place criminals on the moon or in space somewhere while we’re at it.
January 19th, 2010 - 14:08
medical experiements on animals or people is cruel done by cruel people for the sadistic pleasure they get out of tortureing small animals. Not all experients are necessary.
Some men start by tortureing small animals and then go to people.
January 21st, 2010 - 00:04
No.
But it’s a tempting notion.
January 23rd, 2010 - 16:19
PETA does not even deserve the periods they want in their acronym. I say to inject them with every disease known to man and then let them make the decisions for themselves. They are generally selfish azzholes anyway and would scream to have their own dog killed to save themselves. They thik they are the most self vital people in the world. They are just a s.i.c.k. cult sort of organization and use terrorist tactics – and as we know – George Bush has sworn to eliminate terrorists.
January 27th, 2010 - 03:31
no peta serves a fantastic purpose they might go overboard at era but the protection of the animals is vital as such peta does well .
with animal studies are done if that part goes well drugs and procedures are tested on people who volunteer . some might be from peta who knows .
new drugs and knowledge is needed but so too is the checks that we have in place to insure animals of any kind are not just ill-treated for stupid things such as hair spray .
when it is possible not to test on animals and still insure safety of products we must use that option every time .
January 28th, 2010 - 20:51
PETA= People intake tasty animals
January 31st, 2010 - 11:03
P.E.T.A. is that people intake tasty animals?
February 2nd, 2010 - 18:03
There’s no difference between scientists who perform sadistic experiments on animals and the likes of Josef Mengele.