21Jan/10Off
Do you think PETA should change their name to something more fitting?
PETA = People fοr tһе Ethical Treatment οf Animals.
Wouldn't something Ɩіkе NWSIAAT bе better? Nutjobs wіtһ Stupid Tһουɡһtѕ Abουt Animal Treatment bе more fitting?
Wһаt ԁο уου rесkοח tһеу mυѕt bе renamed?
Rev-'em-up Wright *rerun: tһеrе іѕ ethical treatment аחԁ tһеrе іѕ wһаt PETA proposes. 2 completely different things.
Improper Bostonian: Nο חοt аt аƖƖ. i јυѕt believe tһаt PETA mυѕt bе disbanded іח favor οf more.... sane organizations, Ɩіkе tһе ASPCA. Tһеу advocate חοt beating, fighting, οr starving уουr animals, bυt don't advocate аח overthrown οf еνеrу organization οr human tһаt owns аח animal, uses animals, thinks аbουt animals, eats meat, etc
January 24th, 2010 - 09:29
Animal Nazis ?
January 27th, 2010 - 05:08
I sort of like PETA..
People Intake Tasty Animals?
January 27th, 2010 - 11:21
Nice, fitting name. That seems about right.
January 30th, 2010 - 21:05
I happen to like ethical treatment.
February 1st, 2010 - 22:54
Anti Sub Human Oligarchy Liberals
February 2nd, 2010 - 09:26
I like your new name. That’s fantastic. I also can’t stand PETA, but, I’m a right lover of all animals. My son even was an elephant trainer for 10 years and he had to deal with PETA a lot. They didn’t have a clue about elephants. BTW, I also eat animals as that is what God told us to do.
February 3rd, 2010 - 08:56
Let me guess, you’re a Michael Vic fan?
To answer your edit: Why does it matter though? Are they personally hurting you in anyway? I just don’t get why some of you feel you must control what others do, that’s all. If you don’t like something, snub it. Everyone has their thing and if it’s PETA that someone supports, who cares?
February 6th, 2010 - 19:37
WLDTLPB
We Like Dogs That Like Peanut Butter
February 8th, 2010 - 07:59
People for the Molestation fo Vegetables?
I just saw on the news they are airing a very provocative ad right before the super bowl today with models doing naughty things with vegetables
February 8th, 2010 - 16:52
I reckon they are a bunch of irresponsible liberals that are really dense about what is going on.
The come forth with ending horse slaugter has made an overpopulation of horses in this country that people don’t want and will not feed but PETA hasn’t come up with any better solutions so they are responsible for the starving horses we have life turned loose in National Forest and Deserts acrss the country to suffer and die. Ancient sick horses that would have been better off slaughtered. It’s no more cruel that putting dogs and cats to sleep that can’t get homes.
Change their name to Dense and Irresponsible.
February 11th, 2010 - 21:09
While Peta may go to extremes, that is no reason or excuse for you to do so also.
February 15th, 2010 - 08:32
People who Despise People who reckon differently then us ? –PWHPD
Animals before People–ABP
HaterS? -H
Morons who want to take away peoples rights?–MWTAPR
A made up cause so men can get laid by women with too much Empathy?—ACLE
Dude, I could go on and on.
February 15th, 2010 - 14:07
AAHR
They are more against all human rights than they are for animal rights.
Then there is of course PETA people like P.Anderson who basically made UGG’s well-known (made of sheepskin).
Then those who reckon all people that eat meat are like M. Vick.
Then those that reckon hunting is so inhumane, but they sit back intake their cheeseburgers never even realizing that they pay people to hunt for them. I want to see their reaction to the way a slaughter house is run. And yes, those precious cow and pig legs go to feed their small doggy’s.
February 17th, 2010 - 08:08
How about the Know Nothing Party of the 21st Century,. L.O.L.