17Feb/10Off
Animal cruelty?
Hοw come іf animal cruelty іѕ against tһе law tһе state allows tһе animals tο bе abused аt tһе sluter houses? If someone һаԁ those animals аѕ a pet tһеу wouldent bе allowed tο ԁο tһаt.
well fοr уου guys wһο ѕау tһеу arent treated cruley...http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_chickens.asp
thats һοw tһеу treat chickens tһаt doesnt sound ѕο nice.
Incoming search terms:
- abused chickens
February 18th, 2010 - 06:50
What is a sluter house??
February 19th, 2010 - 05:42
It’s ok if we eat them.
February 19th, 2010 - 11:58
your right!
but i wouldn’t have a cow as a pet!
February 22nd, 2010 - 12:24
Because there is a difference between harvesting an animal and intentionally causing an animal harm and pain. Besides, animals were place here to serve us.
February 23rd, 2010 - 00:25
You mean “Slaughter” houses. They aren’t really abused…they are killed. People eat dog and cats in other countries and they have been for years. We keep those animals in our houses. We eat cows here and in India they worship them. It is just the way life is.
February 23rd, 2010 - 12:12
First of what in gods name is a sluter house. If you mean a slaughter house, the animals are, for the most part, killed humanely. And I’m pretty sure in most places you can place your dog or cat down as long as you do as promptly and painlessly as possible.
February 24th, 2010 - 21:13
i agree all the way.u make a excellent point.if u had a dog u wuldnt just shoot it with a shotgun wuld u no thts wat i thot so i agree
February 27th, 2010 - 12:04
But that is their purpose, they are raised to be food. Its not like they are taking a baseball bat to their heads. If you reckon that is cruel, how about thousands of people that are involved in Dog fights to the death? Now that is dreadful.
March 1st, 2010 - 21:54
amen.
March 4th, 2010 - 05:10
You are making a excellent questions. You have to see what constitutes a pet and waht constitutes a product, since animals at slaughter houses are considered products.
March 5th, 2010 - 19:15
Having animals live in your house like humans instead of out in their natural habitat is the most selfish, cruel thing you can do to an animal.
March 7th, 2010 - 03:28
right thatt.
im a vegetarian.
i look at my cat and say, ‘oh, why dont i just eat you?’
intake animals is just grosss.
March 9th, 2010 - 04:34
I could not give you a satifactory answer to your question, because I know what I have done in my garden. And that I know that I can use a similar vocabulary, used to describe what is happening to animals, to describe what that is, exactly.
Now I can sleep in peace knowing what people do to people.
March 12th, 2010 - 06:02
What’s a “sluter house”?
March 13th, 2010 - 04:31
Years ago the small farmer had cows or chicken or a few pigs to raise so he could sell them and make a few dollars to support his family. Yes, I have seen the documentaries on the new, corporate animal farms, and they do disgust me. Not the fact that animals are considered food, but the fact that the laws allocate these large companies to abuse these animals, and in that I have to agree with the vegans. Whereas the farmer cared very well for his animals, the profit-hungry companies (who, by the way are putting the small farmers on welfare) do not give a darn about anything except the Almighty dollar. Laws regarding animal farms must change. There are a sufficient number of smaller farmers that would then benefit, the companies can stuff it and a larger number of the population would breathe a sigh of relief to see that these animals are not further abused. We do not eat cats and dogs. But cows and sheep, chickens and pigs are not always considered pets, since their primary purpose is to feed the people. Sorry, honey. I like my pets, but I like a darn excellent steak now and again. Carolsandytoes1
March 16th, 2010 - 12:25
That’s a excellent question. It doesn’t make much sense that companies can scald chickens alive and slaughter cows while they’re still conscious to make a profit, whereas these companies would be charged with felony cruelty to animals if they did the same things to cats or dogs. All animals feel pain and suffer, regardless of their species. It’s sad that an animal has to be a cat or a dog in this the upper classes to get protection from extreme cruelty.
March 18th, 2010 - 04:11
For some sick reason livestock do not fall under animal cruelty laws. The FDA regulates humane slaughter proceedures but apparently they are not doing their job very well. What is worse is that around February they implimented the animal enterprise terrorist act that prevents whistle blowers from producing or releasing evidence against animal enterprises that would upshot in the loss of profits. This includes slaughter houses, animal labs, and animal entertainment agencies.
March 18th, 2010 - 21:27
Well it is very incorrect because an animal is an animal and regardless of what it is raised for it still feels, but many people believe that these are certain animals that are specifically born and raised to feed so they believe that it is useless to waste affection, time, and money on providing certain things to these animals that according to humans have no other purpose but to feed us. They do not see animals, but food. It is very incorrect, and honestly does not make sense. Many people choose to even acknowledge these animals as even income beings because of their mass population and feel that it would not make sense to give these beings that are feeding us a proper amount of room to do idiotic things such as stretch a wing or even crazier turn around! Isn’t that ludicrous! Well you make an brilliant point and i thank you for questioning “authority.”
March 20th, 2010 - 07:56
Maybe you must write to Mr. Bush about this….HE will do something about it!
March 21st, 2010 - 18:25
Animal cruelty laws don’t apply for animals in slaughter houses because meat manufacture is considered an industry. There are some bills that are trying to be passed now though to include factory farmed animals in these laws!
March 24th, 2010 - 15:24
Its unlawful to torture something, unless your making profit, just like its unlawful to kill thousands of people, unless your a pharmaceutical company making profit.
And more than 90 percent of people aren’t aware of either of these problems.
March 27th, 2010 - 10:31
It is right that animals are sometimes killed inhumanely in slaughter houses, but It’s also right that there are places that they are killed humanely. It really depends on which slaughter house I suppose.